[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

<misc>proofreading

>> keystrokes...we all have built in error correction ability. However, the 
>> bottom line is poor spelling and other mistakes make a poor impression to 
>> the reader no matter how good the info. Whether it is for the "Freakin' 
>> Net" or anywhere else it doesn't doesn't (sic) take long to re-read what 
you 
>> wrote to make sure spelling and punctuation are correct.
>
>Now _I'm_ confused. Is that a double negative meaning it takes a while
>to do?  Is that tongue-in-cheek humor?  Did this person not proof a
>message about proof reading?  Maybe there was some 90 proof involved?
>>8^)
Next time I won't be so subtle (not that there will be a next time...). I 
braced myself for hoots and happy shouts of "you idiot" on this one. 
Instead, one person noticed. Oh well, back to school for a refresher 
course in Humor 101...

John Darwak
325e/i (many mods)