Re: [ihc] 1200 vs. 1210 models

To: "Joseph Shaw, II" <josephshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ihc@xxxxxxxxxx>, <oldihc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ihc] 1200 vs. 1210 models
From: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:25:37 -0600
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <00a201c3b9d5$5e6c3bf0$6101a8c0@Atlas>
Reply-to: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joseph Shaw, II" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 13:40
Subject: [ihc] 1200 vs. 1210 models

> I am sorry-I know this has been covered, but what does the "10" mean when
> added to a model like this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Michael
>

That it's newer... that's the only difference I've ever seen.  Maybe the
upped the GVWR slightly with the model change?  But the years with 1210s
don't have 1200s...

-Ryan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ihc] 1200 vs. 1210 models
  - From: Allan Ericson

References:
- [ihc] 1200 vs. 1210 models
  - From: Joseph Shaw, II

Prev by Date: Re: [ihc] 1200 vs. 1210 models
Next by Date: Re: [ihc] Info sought on rear gas tank setups for trucks
Previous by thread: Re: [ihc] 1200 vs. 1210 models
Next by thread: Re: [ihc] 1200 vs. 1210 models
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index