Re: [ihc] missing posts

To: <jma@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "T.R.E.Jr." <T_R_E_Jr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ihc-digest@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ihc] missing posts
From: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:47:42 -0600
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: "Ryan Moore" <baradium@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ihc@xxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John M. Adams" <[email protected]>
To: "Ryan Moore" <[email protected]>; "T.R.E.Jr." <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 09:52
Subject: RE: [ihc] missing posts


> Hmmm... Nope. I see that when one sends to [email protected],
> it gets copied back to the sender anyway. So that doesn't explain it.
>
> Guess I'll sit down and shut up now...
>
> -John A.
>
<snip>

I can tell you that I just got a message on the digest.... that I sent a few
days ago... seems to have just been a very long delay?

-Ryan

References:
- RE: [ihc] missing posts
  - From: John M. Adams

Prev by Date: RE: [ihc] Things That Go GRRRRRRRIND In The Night!
Next by Date: Re: [ihc] in-tank fuel sock
Previous by thread: Re[2]: [ihc] missing posts
Next by thread: [ihc] Things That Go GRRRRRRRIND In The Night!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index