[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
proofreading what you wrote (rote?)
-
Subject: proofreading what you wrote (rote?)
-
From: Patrick Donahue <[email protected]>
-
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:38:52 -0400
> keystrokes...we all have built in error correction ability. However, the
> bottom line is poor spelling and other mistakes make a poor impression to
> the reader no matter how good the info. Whether it is for the "Freakin'
> Net" or anywhere else it doesn't doesn't (sic) take long to re-read what you
> wrote to make sure spelling and punctuation are correct.
Now _I'm_ confused. Is that a double negative meaning it takes a while
to do? Is that tongue-in-cheek humor? Did this person not proof a
message about proof reading? Maybe there was some 90 proof involved?
>8^)
I've seen some pretty smart people who just couldn't spell. I've seen
some foreigners do a pretty good job with our language with all its
various rules of spelling violated even in Webster's. I used to be able
to spell pretty well myself, then old age started taking hold. If you
can't or don't want to read it, page down.
- --
Pat Donahue
Vienna, VA
'91 M5 4GTFUL
'72 MGB 8LYFGR&