[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Intake Air Temp
-
Subject: Intake Air Temp
-
From: Jay Snyder <[email protected]>
-
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 08:38:04 -0400
You mention seem to think that 180F vs. 80F isn't a significant difference in
air density. I beg to differ. Ask any airplane pilot about take-off and
climb performance of his airplane on a 90F day vs. a 60F day. It is
significant.
The following is taken from the specs on the Lycoming O-360 in my Piper
Archer II (airplane, these are 70~75% cruise power settings, the peak power
of this engine
is 180HP @ 2700RPM -- can you say Torque!):
OS TMP HP @2400RPM Sea Level
100F 126HP
80F 130HP
60F 135HP
40F differnece makes a 7% difference in available HP (and torque), so the
100F difference you speak of is more significant than that.
Original Message:
I've been reading some of the recent threads about proper location for the
air intake, and want to offer some thoughts. Specifically, I recall some
posts that say the intake should not be located inside the engine compartment
(as with some of the K&N devices?) because the air temperature will be much
higher. I get the sense that the posters think that air temp will be much
higher. I presume the concern is that air density will therefore be lower, and
that power output will be significantly reduced.
Let's consider a case where the intake is located inside the engine
compartment. Even though the engine compartment is _d***_ hot when we stop
the car and open the hood on a hot day, I don't think that temp should be
anywhere close to the temp of the intake air. This is because the engine has
to pull air from _outside_ the car, otherwise it would quickly use up all the
(hot) air inside the engine compartment. While the car is moving, it seems
that as a worst case the intake air would be no warmer than the thermostat
temp. This would be the case if _all_ the air that gets into the engine
compartment were forced to come through the radiator. I'm guessing there are
lots of pathways by which intake air can bypass the radiator, so the intake
air temp should actually be cooler than the thermostat temp.
Another important factor is that air density is not inversely related to air
temp in degrees F. It's proportional to degrees F _plus_ 460. (For example,
the ratio of the density of air at 180 vs. 80 degrees F is (80 + 460)/(180 +
460) or 0.84.) Smaller temp changes have even smaller effects on air density.
Granted that in a real race situation, racers are looking for any slight
advantage they can get. It's just that I wonder if the intake location is all
that important in non-race setups. Any other thoughts?
=============================================
Jay Snyder
email: [email protected]
phone: 717-540-2895
Development Engineer, Automachine Systems Group
AMP Incorporated