[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
<MISC> Re: crumple zones
-
Subject: <MISC> Re: crumple zones
-
From: "Moran, Jim" <[email protected]>
-
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 96 12:28:50
To further this discussion, European manufacturers, notably Mercedes, also
design their cars to survive an offset head-on collision. Their opinion, backed
by statistical research, is that offset collisions are much more prevalent than
full head-on collisions. Since only one half of the car must dissipate the
crash energy, it must be stiffer to prevent intrusion into the passenger cell.
Of course, when these cars are tested in the US required full head-on collision,
their stiffer crash structure is a detriment.
On another note, auto makers, consumer groups and the federal government cite
crash test and injury statistics. However, none of them mention the
repeatability of the tests. That is because they are not repeatable! As a
scientific test, government mandated crash tests provide no absolutes, they can
only be used as a guide.
To the person who will only strap their loved ones into a 3/4 ton Suburban;
light trucks (including mini-vans and SUVs) are currently not required to meet
the safety, emissions, and economy requirements of passenger cars. While it is
true that bigger is better, a Suburban may be less survivable than a Caprice.
It likely doesn't have dual air bags, side impact protection, or the same dash
and trim padding that a car is required to have. And, it pollutes more and
guzzles gas.
Regards,
Jim Moran
'88 M6