re:[alfa] alfa radiator/hydraulic tensioner question

[Bruce Murray <bruce.s.murray@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Danny,

Well I have always been convinced that the hydraulic tensioner is the more 
robust and better engineered device.
I will refrain from boring the group and not list my reasons for the prefernce.
My 200k 164 has a hydraulic tensioner from new and will continue to do so 
until the car breathes its last.
I do rebuild the tensioner at every belt change - I laid in a supply of 
kits a few years ago to keep me going.

However I had to consider my position on my 164S since it was already 
fitted with a mechanical device.  I concluded that it would be risky to 
remove the mechanical set up and so I installed a new mechanical unit.  The 
previous installation was done by ALGAR in PA, and they seemed to know what 
they were doing.  I was verrrry careful setting it up and touch wood it has 
been fine for 10,000 miles.

So I think if you are meticulous about the process and buy an ALFA supplied 
part, you should not have a problem.
However it will not suffer fools gladly!

Good luck

Bruce Murray




> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 06:17:59 -0800 (PST)
> From: danny P <robustful@domain.elided>
> Subject: [alfa] alfa radiator/hydraulic tensioner question
>
> Has anyone upgraded their 164 radiator?  I'm getting
> mine ready for the Texas heat and have heard that it's
> the reason why 164s run so hot.  I know Tom Zat has
> one for $500 but that's just a little too steep for
> me.
>
> Due to the hot engine compartment, what's you all's
> opinion and going back to the hydraulic tensioner in
> the 164?  Will the seals tend to weep sooner then 30k?
>
> This mechanical tensioner and the engine possibly
> turning backwards on startup/turn off really has
> gotten me weary.  I'd like the hydraulic since you'll
> at least get a warning.
>
> Thanks,
> Danny
> Dallas, Texas
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to majordomo@domain.elided