Alfa Romeo/Alfa Romeo Digest Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: alfa-digest V9 #347
On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 06:52 PM, alfa-digest wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:47:44 -0700
From: alfacybersite <[email protected]>
Subject: Don't believe this applies to Alfas
While hardly brought up to be a major flame (boy if I'd only thought of
comparing Formula 1 to NASCAR...speaking of apples and oranges) I do
have a few unanswered questions regarding 'preselective gearboxes
(NAC)'. (What's a NAC?).
Thanks Nicky, John, Bill, George, Will, James. Mind if I call you by
your first names?
So how comes the Coatal has 1 thru 4 and no R on their selector?
The Cotal Gearbox has no R on it because Reverse was engaged
mechanically via a small lever on the transmission tunel IIRC.
My 'Made in England' automotive encyclopedias states (under Cord):
(We're talking 1935 here) "After all, the initial production target was
around 1000 cars a month, and surely the transmissions would be ready
soon. They were not...."
Since the book's in English (as opposed to American English), I'm
assuming they would have said if it was a Wilson (or even a Cotal)
design. Did Auburn - Cord - Duesenberg start with one of the above two
designs and try to modify or did they try to reinvent the wheel - or
did
they start with one of the above two, try to modify, and then squeak
by...eventually? I have seen Cords actually move (and assume) shift
gears / have their gears shifted.
The Cord preselector gearbox was designed by the same company who built
the Cord's V-8 engine (Lycoming, I believe, but it might have been
Continental.) It was a vacuum operated design using manifold vacuum to
actually shift the gears. My dad owned a supercharged 812 sedan for a
while when I was away in college. I drove it a number of times. My main
impression was that the thing didn't work very well (the car had
recently been overhauled, and things were SUPPOSED to be as new, but in
those days, who knows what passed for a restoration). It had the same
problem that the old vacuum-powered windshield wipers had, they only
really worked during times of greatest manifold vacuum, decelerating
and accelerating. At sustained speeds, there wasn't much vacuum and
most windshield wipers would stall. The gearbox worked the same way.
Under hard acceleration, the gearshift worked as advertised - you
placed the little gear 'switch' in first, let out on the clutch and
gave it the accelerator and the car would take off in first, remove
your foot from the gas pedal, and simultaneously pump the clutch and
the lever would flick into second and second gear would engage. To down
shift, you moved the lever to the next lower gear and then worked the
gas pedal and clutch as you normally would in a manual transmission
car. To shift up merely pump the clutch again. If you accelerated
briskly, it worked fine, if you accelerated in a leisurely manner,
there was a long pause and a big clunk as the car slooowwwwlllyyy
changed gears. This is nothing like the vacuum-hydraulic Wilson
pre-selector or the ultra-quick Cotal electric as far as I can tell.
Biba
Irwindale, CA USA
George Graves
'86 GTV-6
now with 3.0 liter 'S' engine
and Power Steering
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]
Home |
Archive |
Main Index |
Thread Index