Re: Webers or Spica?

To: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Webers or Spica?
From: [email protected] (Greg Hermann)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:00:54 -0500
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-to: [email protected] (Greg Hermann)
Sender: [email protected]

At 11:31 AM 11/21/02, [email protected] wrote:
>In a message dated 11/21/2002 6:23:12 AM Central Standard Time,
>[email protected] writes:
>
>> The atomization from virtually ANY injection system (unless air shrouded
>> injectors or compressed air boosted injectors are used) does not even
>> APPROACH the level of atomization of the fuel which is achieved by Webers.
>>
>
>And just what is your EVIDENCE for this claim?  Something more than urban
>legend please.

Observation of high speed photos of both.

WOT bsfc numbers for properly tuned DCOE vs. injection.

Greg
>
>Jerry in Houston
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Webers or Spica?
Next by Date: Water in trans,backyard Alfas
Previous by thread: Re: Webers or Spica?
Next by thread: Re: Webers or Spica?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index