Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:47:32 -0400
From: Joe Elliott <[email protected]>
Subject: re: 1.8 turbo in a 74 spider???
At 2:53 PM +0000 10/11/02, alfa-digest wrote:
>Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:49:55 -0500 (CDT)
>From: "Gregory S. Youngblood" <[email protected]>
>Subject: re: 1.8 turbo in a 74 spider???
>
>Joe Elliott said:
>> This is what I've been advocating all along. I'm told the putting a TS
>> in a Spider involves a hood clearance problem, which the 1.8T
>> wouldn't have--the head is just like any other 1750, except it has a
>> fairly shallow bit of intake plumbing running over it in the stock
>> installation. Of course a modern supercharger and modern EFI a la
>> Biba's musings will get you better performance, but I still think this
>> is a great idea for those on a budget. In fact, this is (in my
>> opinion) the engine that Alfa should have put in the later Spider
>> Veloces to stay ahead of the Miata. Of course 160 turbocharged
>> horses vs. the 148 normally-aspirated horses of the TwinSpark is a
>> matter of taste, but the way I see it, no one has any experience
>> working on the TS in this country. The 1.8 Turbo, however, is just a
>> 1750 with some generic '80s turbo hardware on it. You could probably
>> get these engines for a lot cheaper than that eBay auction, however. I
> > know my Opel could use one of those...
>
>
>OK, so now the question of the hour -- it seems a lot of 1750 and 2000
>components are interchangable. Not all, but it sure does seem like a lot.
>
>If that's the case, could this be the foundation of 2000 turbo kit? Would
>the turbo, plumbing, and intake I'm assuming (not exactly sure where the
>turbo feeds) from this fit a 2000?
>
>Greg
I've wondered the same thing, and I imagine that the answer is yes,
but I don't have enough 4cyl experience to know for sure.
Joe