RE: Re[2]: snap in seatbelt

To: "'Richard Welty'" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Re[2]: snap in seatbelt
From: "Brian Shorey" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:51:44 -0400
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc
Reply-to: "Brian Shorey" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

> > You *don't* want a setup that snaps into the rear seat 
> belts themselves.
> 
> actually, this is exactly what Schroth makes.

And this passes tech?  You've got a nice, 2" or 3" wide racing belt,
that then snaps into a relatively thin 1.5" standard seat belt?

Ignoring the interlocking mechanism, just the smaller belt width would
cause me concern.

???

bs
--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re[4]: snap in seatbelt
  - From: Richard Welty <[email protected]>
- RE: Re[2]: snap in seatbelt
  - From: James Montebello <[email protected]>

References:
- Re[2]: snap in seatbelt
  - From: Richard Welty <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re[2]: snap in seatbelt
Next by Date: Re[4]: snap in seatbelt
Previous by thread: Re[2]: snap in seatbelt
Next by thread: Re[4]: snap in seatbelt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index