Re: 164 TS vs V6

To: "Alfa Digest" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 164 TS vs V6
From: "Marco Steegh" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:40:07 +0100
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
References: <B870D93A.68A3%[email protected]> <002d01c1a1a3$710e7a80$44282ed5@nl>
Reply-to: "Marco Steegh" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

I'll have to agree with G.J.

Where I live we have a small group of nutty-Alfisti and at one time four of
us drove different 164's: 2.0 TS/3.0 V6/3.0 QV and I had a 3.5 QV. All very
nice cars, but the increase in horsepower is the big difference. Most common
problems were related to electrical components.

My 0.02 (EURO)cents: buy a serviced V6. Preferably a QV. You won't be
disappointed!

Grtz.

Marco

--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]

References:
- 164 TS vs V6
  - From: Nick Brooker <[email protected]>
- Re: 164 TS vs V6
  - From: "G.J." <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 164 TS vs V6
Next by Date: Re: Parts Needed 105 GTV & Alfetta GT
Previous by thread: Re: 164 TS vs V6
Next by thread: 164 TS vs V6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index