RE: Belts or chains (which are you into????)

To: "Tim Hancock" <[email protected]>, "alfa digest" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Belts or chains (which are you into????)
From: "Brian Shorey" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 16:27:21 -0400
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-reply-to: <001701c14f11$7eca25a0$3a6643d4@timhancock>
Reply-to: "Brian Shorey" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

<snip>
> The only advantage I will concede to a timing belt is that it can
contribute
> to a smoother engine at high revs. Other than that I think they are a
curse to
> anyone except those with warranty cover or very large wallets. I hate em
( In
> case anyone had missed this)

I'm with you Tim.  I'd pay extra for a car with a chain.

bs

--
to be removed from alfa, see /bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]

References:
- Belts or chains (which are you into????)
  - From: "Tim Hancock" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Mirrors
Next by Date: Spider Targa-type hardtop
Previous by thread: Belts or chains (which are you into????)
Next by thread: More Belts or chains
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Archive | Main Index | Thread Index